Skip Navigation
Link to HHS Website Department of Health & Human Services
 
Link to Administration on Aging HomePage
  Home > Aging Statistics > Profile of Older Americans
Home
About AoA
Press Room
Elders & Families
Emergency Preparedness
Aging Statistics
AoA Programs
Program Results
Grant Opportunities
AoA Funded Resource Centers
              

A Profile of Older Americans: 2011

Poverty

Almost 3.5 million elderly persons (9.0%) were below the poverty level in 2010. This poverty rate is not statistically different from the poverty rate in 2009 (8.9%). Another 2.3 million or 5.8% of the elderly were classified as "near-poor" (income between the poverty level and 125% of this level).

One of every 15 elderly Whites** (6.8%) was poor in 2010, compared to 18.0% of elderly African-Americans, 14.6% of Asians, and 18.0% of elderly Hispanics. Higher than average poverty rates were found in 2010 for older persons who lived in principal cities (11.2%), outside metropolitan areas (i.e. rural areas and small towns) (10.4%), and in the South (10.5%).

Older women had a higher poverty rate (10.7%) than older men (6.7%) in 2010. Older persons living alone were much more likely to be poor (16.0%) than were older persons living with families (5.3%). The highest poverty rates were experienced among Hispanic women (40.8%) who lived alone and also by older Black women (30.7%) who lived alone.

During 2011, the U.S. Census Bureau released a new Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM). The SPM methodology shows a significantly higher number of older persons below poverty than is shown by the official poverty measure. For persons 65 and older this poverty measure shows a poverty level of 15.9% (an increase of over 75% over the official rate of 9.0%). Unlike the official poverty rate, the SPM takes into account regional variations in the cost of housing etc. and, even more significantly, the impact of both non-cash benefits received (e.g., SNAP/food stamps, low income tax credits, WIC, etc.) and non-discretionary expenditures including medical out-of-pocket (MOOP) expenses. For persons 65 and over, MOOP was the major source of the significant differences between these measures. Bear in mind that the SPM does not replace the official poverty measure.

(Based on data from Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2010,” P60 239, issued September, 2011, by the U.S. Census Bureau and related Census detailed tables on the U.S. Census Bureau web site and on “The Research Supplemental Poverty Measure,” P60-241, issued November 2011)

Back to Previous | Main | Next




Last Modified: 12/31/1600